In “CA Starts the Race To Self-Destruction Among the “Big Four” in Virtualization Management” we explained why the big four are not a good choice for managing your virtual infrastructure (and for that matter your private/hybrid/public cloud). There are two top level reasons for this. The first is that virtualization both breaks how legacy management solutions work and introduces a new set of requirements that legacy solutions cannot address. The second is that the management vendors who are finding success in the virtualization market have focused upon an “easy to try, easy to buy, and affordable to own” business strategy that is the opposite of how the big four do business.
Articles Tagged with Virtualization Capacity Management
VMware has announced that it has delivered vCenter Operations Suite 5.0. This is a significant step forward for the management of virtualized environments because it consolidates many of the functions traditionally into a suite that is least somewhat integrated (and becoming more integrated over time). The key thing that VMware is bringing to the table is the integration of resource based performance management resource based capacity management, configuration management, and a brand new vCenter Infrastructure Navigator (VIN).
The question of how to manage virtualized environments as they scale up in size and complexity, and grow to host business critical applications (instead of just low hanging fruit tactical applications owned by IT) is clearly starting to get attention by larger vendors with serious ambitions in the virtualization performance management market. NetApp is acquiring Akorri, putting NetApp into a leadership position in Infrastructure Performance Management. Now SolarWinds acquires Hyper9.
Now the VMware has release Capacity IQ it is worth taking a look at the category of Capacity Planning and Monitoring Tools for VMWare (and other virtualization platforms), and see how they compare to VMware’s offering. This article highlights a couple of the capabilities of each product and is not intended to be an exhaustive product review. More detail is contained in the White Paper available for download at the end of this article.
uptime software has made a name for itself by providing a breadth of monitoring functionality across Unix and Windows server platforms, with an easy to use scalable and distributed architecture at an attractive price point. These features have allowed uptime to consistently capture monitoring opportunities against the big four (IBM, HP, CA, BMC) whose offerings are sometimes seen as complex, difficult to implement and maintain, and saddled with onerous licensing and maintenance policies by cost conscious IT operations executives.