Ten years ago, legacy management software vendors were busy building Franken-Monitors. Those Franken-Monitors now consist of legacy management offerings that are neither well integrated, nor in any way able to keep up with pace of innovation in the industry. In order to survive your transition to the software-defined data center and the cloud, you will need a management software strategy and a management software architecture that will allow you to keep up with the pace of change without buying or building a Franken-Monitor.
Articles Tagged with CA
Legacy management software vendors like IBM, HP, BMC and CA are in deep trouble. They are in trouble across their entire portfolio of management solutions due to two simple facts. Their products are not suited for the new dynamic and distributed IT environment, and the way in which they sell and market those products is inconsistent with how the new buyers of management software want to buy those products. A great example of the trouble that legacy vendors are in is how CA and its APM solutions (Introscope) stack up against modern solutions like those from New Relic, AppDynamics, and Compuware/dynatrace.
With Dell buying Quest, and VMware buying DynamicOps, the Virtualization Management landscape has been forever changed. Now Dell is a full fledged systems management vendor, and VMware has crossed the line into managing both their own and other hypervisors, and being able to construct clouds that even include non-virtualized resources. This gives rise to a very interesting question. Are Dell and VMware turning into traditional systems management vendors like CA, IBM, HP, and BMC or are they preparing to disrupt the existing systems management business just like VKernel (part of Quest, and now Dell) and DynamicOps did when they were startups?
There have been a large number of Announcements that have been made for VMworld Copenhagen with respect to virtualization and cloud security. This shows quite an interesting growth in the market, and that even 1 month apart there is still more to be announced within the virtual and cloud security spaces. There are three very interesting announcements that show further integration between vendors.
In “IT as a Service Reference Architecture“, we presented a a categorization of the the functionality and the products that are needed in order to construct an IT as a Service system. Purposely missing from this architecture was the question of how to monitor the performance of the services delivered from the service catalog via the underlying policies and automation in the IT as a Service stack.
Mainstream virtual desktop solutions have focused their efforts on providing the best platform for hosting virtual desktop environments. Hypervisors, image management, and connection brokers are the top feature sets that companies have looked at during their comparisons. Moving up the stack, these vendors are now focusing on user personalization management, but do not have what is considered to be a full desktop management solution. So are our end-to-end virtual desktop solutions really complete?