SSD options for Virtual (and Physical) Environments Part IV: What type of SSD is best for your needs.

By Greg Schulz, Server and StorageIO @storageio

Part 1 of this series laid out the basics of nand flash Solid State Devices (SSD) with part II discussing endurance and performance. Part III looked at SSD options for virtual servers, VDI or virtual desktop as well as storage for physical server environments, usage and configuration criteria. Let us build off those and continue to look at what SSD to use for different environments.

For write, endurance today that means single level cell (SLC) combined with a robust flash translation layer (FTL) implementation combing software firmware and hardware for write intensive scenarios requiring a long duty cycle. Granted SLC is more expense per GByte and that multilevel cell (MLC) provides more capacity in a given density, look at the total value. For example, if SLC has a higher price per GB and your requirement is to use that technology for as long as possible, you will get more program/erase (P/E) cycles with SLC than with MLC. That means then if endurance is a priority, compare on a cost per P/E basis. That is what is the cost of P/Es, which might mean using an SLC device longer, or, using a lower cost MLC and then plan on replacing it sooner. However as noted in previous posts, look beyond the chips or MLC and SLC dies also considering how they are combined with FTL, software and firmware as part of a solution.

In the future, if not already today there are robust MLC based solutions in or entering the market that have improved FTLs, hardware, software and firmware to improve on P/E wear and tear on the media improving endurance and overall reliability. Some solutions will also be, or are already being labeled eMLC or Enterprise MLC as a hybrid approach. IMHO, these are similar to the role of enterprise high capacity SATA not to be confused with eSATA (external SATA) and desktop SATA HDDs. Both enterprise and desktop SATA HDDs have high capacity, however their duty cycles and characteristics differ as do cost.

While the focus on media has been mainly around nand flash for SSD, let us not forget the role of DDR DRAM. DRAM can be found on PCIe flash SSD cards as a read/write buffer or cache to help with wear leveling and other management tasks. DRAM is used in physical servers and controllers for device drivers and their buffers or data structures. DRAM is also found in SSD appliances used for software, buffers, data structures and other tasks, as is also the case in storage systems. Even in the Hybrid Hard Disk Drives (HHDD) like the Seagate Momentus XTs, which I have in my laptops and some servers that include SLC flash SSD, there is also DRAM working in a compliment manner.

Moving on from the mediums, what type of SSD to use when and where will vary on several factors however, they can be simplified down to the following:

  • Are you looking for an extension of physical server DRAM?
  • Are you looking for a cache (read or read/write) to compliment or enhance underlying internal dedicated, or external shared storage?
  • Are you looking for a dedicated internal storage and IO medium to replace HDDs?
  • What IO, performance, storage, server, application, database or other problem are you looking to address?
  • Do you need high availability with ability to failover or move VMs from one PM to another?
  • How large is the data footprint of the application that needs more performance?
  • What are your growth plans or requirements?
  • Do you need to support more IOPs and transactions, or more bandwidth throughput?
  • What is the size of the IO or transactions being performed for comparison purposes?
  • What are the read/write characteristics of your applications?
  • How many PMs or physical servers need to get some benefit from having SSD?
  • How will you move data or applications around to derive benefit of the SSD?

The above are just a few questions that should drive the conversation of what type of SSD solution you need for a given scenario.

Various packaging and deployment options for SSD
Figure 1: Various packaging and deployment options for SSD

In some cases, it will be a PCIe card with SLC flash configured as a read or read/write cache to complement and enhance your underlying iSCSI, SAS, FC or FCoE shared block storage such an EMC VFCache or those from LSI and Mircon among others.

In other cases it will be a PCIe card configured as a internal dedicated flash SSD target in a server using application or server based replication to another server equipped with SSD card for HA (for example FusionIO, LSI, Micron, TMS and others).

Other scenarios will involve PCIe cards, like those among others mentioned above, installed in ether a traditional Cisco, Dell, HP, IBM, SuperMicro or Oracle server configured as an appliance for hosting VMs or other applications, or simply deployed as a traditional physical machine. Besides using PCIe cards, those same servers or appliances can also be configured with SAS or SATA 2.5” or 3.5” SSDs installed into drive slots as individual drives using software based RAID, or attached to a PCIe RAID card.

Yet another option is to place SAS and SATA 2.5” or 3.5” SSDs (MLC or SLC) into the drive slots of storage systems and enclosures for use as a target, or as EMC has done, as an optional cache on the CLARiiON and VNX product lines. Some storage systems and appliances combine different SSD  technologies including a mix of drive form factor SSD as targets managed with tiering tools and software along with PCIe cache cards or special form factor SSD DIMMs. For example, Oracle uses various SSD packing approaches in their 7000 series, as do others including NetApp. NetApp as an example supports a PCIe flash card as a performance accelerator module (PAM) along with drive form factor SSDs. The above and those solutions from other storage systems and appliance vendors can also be complimented by host or server side caching.

Which type of approach, what specific product will come down to the problem being solved or opportunity being presented, preference to packaging approaches or vendors, physical server PCIe expansion slot space, budget and comfort level among other factors.

If you are not sure which SSD approach, packaging, or product is best for your environment, drop a note or comment here and will provide perspective and suggestions in addition to those I am guessing vendors and vars will offer.

Here are some related SSD links to learn more in addition to the previous posts in this series.

Share this Article:

The following two tabs change content below.
Greg Schulz
Greg Schulz is Founder and Sr. Analyst of independent IT advisory and consultancy firm Server and StorageIO (StorageIO). He has worked in IT at an electrical utility, financial services and transportation firms in roles ranging from business applications development to systems management and architecture planning. Greg has also worked for various vendors in addition to an analyst firm before forming StorageIO. Mr. Schulz is author of several books (Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking – CRC Press, The Green and Virtual Data Center – CRC Press, Resilient Storage Networks: Designing Flexible Scalable Data Infrastructures – Elsevier), active with social media with his engaging approach and a top ranked blogger. He has a degree in computer science and master’s degree in software engineering. Learn more at www.storageio.com

Related Posts:

Leave a Reply

23 Comments on "SSD options for Virtual (and Physical) Environments Part IV: What type of SSD is best for your needs."


Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Guest
4 years 6 months ago

I think it will be interesting when consumer level hardware supports some of the enterprise features we enjoy now, such as putting a pair of SSDs into a small NAS enclosure to handle IO in front of SATA drives. That aside, I did want to point out that not all flash technology works the same, as with the NetApp example you cited (PAM aka Flash Cache) being a read only cache.

Guest
4 years 6 months ago
Chris good point that not all SSD is the same, even when it comes to a particular form of media such as flash, or even slc vs. mlc vs. emlc let alone packaging. Thus, not all PCIe SLC flash cards are the same, some are targets, some are cache, and some are read while others are read/write (write through or write back). As you point out, netapp has read cache with PAM as well as supporting SSD drive form factor devices as read/write targets along with data cache/promote/demote strategy to use the different tiers/mediums (as do others). So as you… Read more »
Guest
4 years 6 months ago

I have put a pair of Intel SSDs and SATA drives in my Synology DS411, but it’s just not the same as with, say, a Tintri appliance. My NAS is two distinct volumes (small and fast, or big and slow).

If consumer grade SSD hits 1TB in the $200 range, then I suppose it won’t matter. 🙂

Guest
4 years 6 months ago
Chris I like my data too much to put it on a $200 1TB mlc consumer flash SSD ;)… So are you saying you use tintri for a general purpose NAS file server? I can see some scenarios where tintri can make sense for hosting VMs and their data in lieu of a traditional server with SSD or HDDs, however as a general purpose NAS server similar to a synology, wow, would like to have your budget ;)… Now on the other hand, get yourself a 1U or 2U whitebox server that accepts a PCIe RAID card that includes BBU… Read more »
trackback
[…] Related links on SDD, HHDD and HDD More Storage IO momentus HHDD and SSD moments part I More Storage IO momentus HHDD and SSD moments part II IO IO it is off to Storage and IO metrics we go New Seagate Momentus XT Hybrid drive (SSD and HDD) Other Momentus moments posts here here, here, here and here SSD and Storage System Performance Speaking of speeding up business with SSD storage Are Hard Disk Drives (HDD’s) getting too big? Has SSD put Hard Disk Drives (HDD’s) On Endangered Species List? Why SSD based arrays and storage appliances can be… Read more »
trackback
[…] Related links on SDD, HHDD and HDD More Storage IO momentus HHDD and SSD moments part I More Storage IO momentus HHDD and SSD moments part II IO IO it is off to Storage and IO metrics we go New Seagate Momentus XT Hybrid drive (SSD and HDD) Other Momentus moments posts here here, here, here and here SSD and Storage System Performance Speaking of speeding up business with SSD storage Are Hard Disk Drives (HDD’s) getting too big? Has SSD put Hard Disk Drives (HDD’s) On Endangered Species List? Why SSD based arrays and storage appliances can be… Read more »
trackback
More Storage IO momentus HHDD and SSD moments part 11 - StorageIO Blog - IBM Storage Community
4 years 4 months ago
[…] Related links on SDD, HHDD and HDD More Storage IO momentus HHDD and SSD moments part I More Storage IO momentus HHDD and SSD moments part II IO IO it is off to Storage and IO metrics we go New Seagate Momentus XT Hybrid drive (SSD and HDD) Other Momentus moments posts here here, here, here and here SSD and Storage System Performance Speaking of speeding up business with SSD storage Are Hard Disk Drives (HDD's) getting too big? Has SSD put Hard Disk Drives (HDD's) On Endangered Species List? Why SSD based arrays and storage appliances can be… Read more »
trackback
[…] Related links on storage IO metrics and SSD performance What is the best kind of IO? The one you do not have to do Is SSD dead? No, however some vendors might be Storage and IO metrics that matter IO IO it is off to Storage and IO metrics we go SSD and Storage System Performance Speaking of speeding up business with SSD storage Are Hard Disk Drives (HDD’s) getting too big? Has SSD put Hard Disk Drives (HDD’s) On Endangered Species List? Why SSD based arrays and storage appliances can be a good idea (Part I) IT and… Read more »
trackback
[…] Related links on storage IO metrics and SSD performance What is the best kind of IO? The one you do not have to do Is SSD dead? No, however some vendors might be Storage and IO metrics that matter IO IO it is off to Storage and IO metrics we go SSD and Storage System Performance Speaking of speeding up business with SSD storage Are Hard Disk Drives (HDD’s) getting too big? Has SSD put Hard Disk Drives (HDD’s) On Endangered Species List? Why SSD based arrays and storage appliances can be a good idea (Part I) IT and… Read more »
trackback
[…] Related links on storage IO metrics and SSD performance What is the best kind of IO? The one you do not have to do Is SSD dead? No, however some vendors might be Storage and IO metrics that matter IO IO it is off to Storage and IO metrics we go SSD and Storage System Performance Speaking of speeding up business with SSD storage Are Hard Disk Drives (HDD’s) getting too big? Has SSD put Hard Disk Drives (HDD’s) On Endangered Species List? Why SSD based arrays and storage appliances can be a good idea (Part I) IT and… Read more »
trackback
Is SSD dead? No, however some vendors might be - StorageIO Blog - IBM Storage Community
4 years 4 months ago
[…] Related links on storage IO metrics and SSD performance What is the best kind of IO? The one you do not have to do Is SSD dead? No, however some vendors might be Storage and IO metrics that matter IO IO it is off to Storage and IO metrics we go SSD and Storage System Performance Speaking of speeding up business with SSD storage Are Hard Disk Drives (HDD's) getting too big? Has SSD put Hard Disk Drives (HDD's) On Endangered Species List? Why SSD based arrays and storage appliances can be a good idea (Part I) IT and… Read more »
trackback
[…] Related links on storage IO metrics and SSD performance What is the best kind of IO? The one you do not have to do Is SSD dead? No, however some vendors might be Storage and IO metrics that matter IO IO it is off to Storage and IO metrics we go SSD and Storage System Performance Speaking of speeding up business with SSD storage Are Hard Disk Drives (HDD’s) getting too big? Has SSD put Hard Disk Drives (HDD’s) On Endangered Species List? Why SSD based arrays and storage appliances can be a good idea (Part I) IT and… Read more »
Guest
Jonathan
4 years 10 days ago
We will be building a new server with Windows Server 2012 and SQL 2012. Our plan is to build the base server with WS2012 and then virtualize 4 servers. They will be for 1)SQL 2012, 2) Active Directory, 3&4) Exchange 2010 (and later 2013) in both a hub and edge configuration. Aside from e-mail, we have a significant dependance on SQL, with 2 primary DB’s running about 5gb’s each. We are relatively small with close to 20 users, but may continue to grow. Still, our DB has about 9 years worth of data that we routinely process through and run… Read more »
Admin
4 years 8 days ago
Hello, There are several ways to go here. First, I would use TWO servers not just one, you want some level of redundancy. Second, I would not necessarily use SSD for the boot volumes of those virtualization hosts, there is no real need to do this. Third, If your DBs are critical I would use in memory DBs backed by storage (but that is not a trivial combination). Fourth, you may have a security issue where your ‘Edge Mail Server’ is also your ‘Hub Mail Server’ as they share data. Most companies from a security perspective will have an Edge… Read more »
trackback

[…] one on cloud, virtualization and storage networking trends, the other taking a deeper look at Solid State Devices (SSD’s). As in the past, StorageExpo Holland was great in a fantastic venue, with many large […]

trackback
SSD, flash and DRAM, DejaVu or something new? - StorageIO Blog - IBM Storage Community
3 years 9 months ago

[…] one on cloud, virtualization and storage networking trends, the other taking a deeper look at Solid State Devices (SSD's). As in the past, StorageExpo Holland was great in a fantastic venue, with many […]

trackback

[…] as a Seagate Momentus XT HHDD. This particular model is Seagate Momentus XT II 750GB with 8GB SLC nand flash SSD memory integrated inside the 2.5-inch drive […]

trackback
Hard Disk Drives (HDD) for virtual environments (Part I) | Big Data Applications
3 years 7 months ago

[…] SSD options for Virtual (and Physical) Environments Part IV: […]

trackback

[…] nand flash integrated for read buffer in addition to normal DRAM buffer. This model is a XT I (4GB SLC nand flash), may add an XT II (8GB SLC nand flash) at some future […]

trackback
Part II: How many IOPS can a HDD, HHDD or SSD do with VMware? - StorageIO Blog - IBM Storage Community
3 years 3 months ago

[…] nand flash integrated for read buffer in addition to normal DRAM buffer. This model is a XT I (4GB SLC nand flash), may add an XT II (8GB SLC nand flash) at some future […]

trackback

[…] nand flash integrated for read buffer in addition to normal DRAM buffer. This model is a XT I (4GB SLC nand flash), may add an XT II (8GB SLC nand flash) at some future […]

trackback
[…] Related links on SDD, HHDD and HDD More Storage IO momentus HHDD and SSD moments part I More Storage IO momentus HHDD and SSD moments part II IO IO it is off to Storage and IO metrics we go New Seagate Momentus XT Hybrid drive (SSD and HDD) Other Momentus moments posts here here, here, here and here SSD and Storage System Performance Speaking of speeding up business with SSD storage Are Hard Disk Drives (HDD’s) getting too big? Has SSD put Hard Disk Drives (HDD’s) On Endangered Species List? Why SSD based arrays and storage appliances can be… Read more »
trackback

[…] best is that which has the least impact combined with best benefit to an application. This is where SSD, including DRAM- and NAND-flash-based solutions, comes into the conversation for storage […]

wpDiscuz