For years, Gartner has insisted that if an APM tool does not cover each of its “Five Dimensions of APM,” one of which is deep code analysis, then it is not an APM tool. Gartner has therefore defined APM to be relevant only to custom-developed applications. Well, it has finally woken up and realized that 70% of the applications that enterprises run are in fact purchased and that maybe the performance of these applications might be important as well. So, Gartner has created a new category, application-aware infrastructure performance management.
Gartner’s New Categories
In its blog post The Three Topologies in Applications and Infrastructure, Gartner identifies three categories of tools:
- Application Performance Management (APM) focuses just on finding bugs in the code of custom-developed applications. The target task here is to support rapidly changing applications in production, which means finding problems in code quickly and accurately. The target audience for APM tools is the developers who support these applications in production.
- Network Performance Management (NPM) focuses on the operation of the network in support of the applications running in the environment. The target task here is to quickly find issues in the network that are affecting business-critical applications. The target audience is the network engineers who support the local and wide-area networks in the company.
- Application-Aware Infrastructure Performance Management (AA-IPM) focuses on the response time and throughput of every application (custom developed and purchased) in production and on how interactions between the applications and infrastructure are affecting application performance. The target audience is the IT operations teams that have to support every application in production.
Application-Aware Infrastructure Performance Management
If you are in IT operations, you should rejoice. Gartner has finally realized that the existing IT operations tools that you have been using for decades are not adequate for virtualized data centers, software-defined data centers, or clouds. Gartner has further realized that since IT operations gets yelled at when applications are slow, maybe IT operations should have some visibility into how all of the applications are actually performing (with performance being defined as response time and throughput—NOT resource utilization). In Gartner’s research notes, it focuses on AppEnsure, AppFirst, BlueStripe Software, Boundary, Correlsense, Neebula, ExtraHop, INETCO, and Virtual Instruments. We would add Riverbed Cascade and Xangati to Gartner’s list and we have done so below.
Application-Aware Infrastructure Performance Management Tools
AppEnsure is an on-premises and SaaS-delivered APM solution that focuses on identification of each application by name, application topology discovery, end-to-end response time monitoring, and automated root cause analysis across all applications (custom developed or purchased) deployed across any mixture of physical, virtual, and cloud-based environments. AppEnsure is based on an agent in the Windows and Linux OSes that sees the interaction of processes with the operating system, and then sees the interaction, over the network, of those processes with the adjacent components of the application system. AppFirst is an on-premises and SaaS-delivered APM solution that is most frequently used by SaaS software vendors or delivered through cloud vendors to customers. AppFirst focuses on the collection of a comprehensive set of metrics including OS metrics, performance metrics, log files, and statd metrics. It is a perfect complement to New Relic, as it monitors all of the layers of the application system that an agent in the application runtime cannot see. BlueStripe FactFinder is based on an agent that lives in the Windows, Linux AIX and Solaris OS and supports all applications running on those operating systems. This agent watches the network flow between the OS and everything that it is talking to. Through this process, FactFinder discovers the topology of the applications running on each set of monitored servers and calculates an end-to-end and hop-by-hop response-time metric for each application. Since FactFinder is in the OS and not in the application, FactFinder is able to calculate these response-time metrics for any application that runs on a physical or virtual instance of Windows or Linux. This makes FactFinder the only product that provides this level of out-of-box functionality for such a breadth of applications. Boundary is a SaaS-delivered solution for both public and private cloud deployments that focuses on using deep and real-time analysis of the infrastructure and network to understand how issues are affecting application performance. Boundary provides DevOps and IT operations teams with a tool for matching operations visibility with modern application change frequency. This is complementary to code-focused APM solutions deployed to the cloud and on-premises, since these deployments tend to result in the kinds of complicated interactions between the components of the application system that is Boundary’s focus. Correlsense uses an agent that lives in the operating system. It observes the interactions between the application and the OS and maps application topologies and time transaction performance. This is another solution that provides excellent end-to-end and hop-by-hop application response time and transaction response time across a very wide range of applications and run-time environments. ExtraHop Networks uses a mirror port on either the physical network or the VMware vSwitch to see all of the network traffic that flows between physical and virtual servers. This source of data means that ExtraHop can see application topologies and measure end-to-end response time for every TCP/IP-based application on the network without requiring installation of any agents in applications, JVMs, virtual servers, or physical servers. INETCO Insight uses a mirror or span port on physical switches to collect detailed data about the flows between the components of applications. INETCO Insight relies on its Unified Transaction Model framework to reconstruct multi-tier and multi-hop transactions, mining relevant transaction information and business context from the decoded fields. INETCO Insight provides network performance data, application payload intelligence, and detailed transaction response times and completion metrics all in one view, for every transaction. INETCO specializes in payment applications used by large financial institutions. Neebula ServiceWatch focuses on mapping the infrastructure that supports critical business services. Once these maps are automatically created, ServiceWatch can also monitor the key resource utilization statistics in the infrastructure components that comprise each business service. Riverbed Cascade collects layer 2 through 7 TCP/IP data from physical taps on physical switches, from virtual taps on the virtual mirror port of virtual switches, or via agents inserted into the network stack of the Windows or Linux operating system. Cascade includes layer 7 decodes of popular protocols like HTTP, which allows it to identify applications that use unique ports and protocols and to measure their end-to-end response time. Virtual Instruments VirtualWisdom focuses on collecting real-time (subsecond) storage latency and transaction completion information for Fibre Channel–attached storage arrays. This data is collected via a tap that is inserted into the Fibre Channel SAN and sees every transaction that is flowing to and from Fibre Channel–attached storage arrays. VirtualWisdom provides real-time, comprehensive, and deterministic latency information on every storage transaction for a Fibre Channel–attached storage array. Xangati is based on an in-memory database that can process a large amount of real-time data. This allows Xangati to accept, process, and then display end-to-end infrastructure performance information for VDI, server virtualization, and network virtualization scenarios.
How to Choose an Application-Aware Infrastructure Performance Management Solution
The most important thing to do when choosing a performance management tool is to focus on what problem you are trying to solve and for whom you are trying to solve it. This leads to the following process:
- Is this a custom-developed application for which the tool’s job is to support the application development team by finding bugs in production? If so, consider an APM tool (a tool that instruments custom code). If it is the job of the tool to support IT operations staff who have to support every application in production and the infrastructure that supports those applications, then pick the application-aware IPM tool.
- Make sure that the tool you select can automatically identify (by name) the applications you care about, map their topology, measure end-to-end response time and throughput, and provide actionable diagnostics when response time or throughput degrades.
- Press every vendor you consider on its definition of performance. Select only vendors that can prove to you that their tools can measure performance in terms of response time and throughput.
- Despite some of the marketing and sales messaging that goes back and forth between vendors, APM tools do not compete with AA-IPM tools. In fact, you might be well-served buying one of each.
- Pursue a strategy of instrumenting every important application in production with an appropriate solution. If you are virtualizing business-critical applications (for many organizations, they are all that is left to virtualize), then baselining the performance of the application with an AA-IPM solution on physical hardware and then using that baseline as the SLA for its virtualized instance is really the only sensible way to overcome application owners’ objections to the virtualization process. Therefore, choosing the right set of solutions is a critical part of your virtualization initiatives for 2014 and an absolutely essential part of your strategy for migrating to a software-defined data center.
Application-aware–infrastructure performance management tools will be a critical part of ensuring that the applications that matter to your business are highly available and perform well in your software-defined data center. Running rapidly changing applications on a highly dynamic software infrastructure will lead to intractable problems unless proper APM tools are deployed for your developers and AA-IPM tools are deployed for your IT operations staff.
Share this Article:
Latest posts by Bernd Harzog (see all)
- VMware vSphere 6 Attacks Amazon with “One Cloud, Any Application” - February 9, 2015
- VMware vSphere 6 Attacks Red Hat: VMware Integrated OpenStack - February 3, 2015
- Will the Public Cloud Be the Next Legacy Platform? - January 20, 2015