<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Virtualization Practice &#187; Kaviza</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=kaviza" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog</link>
	<description>Virtualization &#38; Cloud Computing News, Resources, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:09:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Citrix invests in Kaviza &#8211; VMWare&#8217;s VDI to suffer from EMC demands?</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=5136&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=citrix-invests-in-kaviza-vmwares-vdi-to-suffer-from-emc-demands</link>
		<comments>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=5136#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Wood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktop Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presentation Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix XenDesktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaviza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware View]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=5136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citrix have invested an unspecified amount of money in Kaviza whose grid architecture eliminates the expensive  infrastructure that VDI solutions. With Kaviza's solution all the functionality needed to provision and manage virtual desktops is consolidated into a single virtual appliance that scales on commodity servers. Will this announcement herald a major take-up of VDI? Indeed, can you really offer a turnkey solution to support your desktop centralisation strategy?


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=3862' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Do Citrix and VMWare fail to deliver a complete centralised desktop offering?'>Do Citrix and VMWare fail to deliver a complete centralised desktop offering?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=4262' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Is a Partnership between VMware and Citrix Possible &#8211; or even Desirable?'>Is a Partnership between VMware and Citrix Possible &#8211; or even Desirable?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=6533' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: A Quest for Citrix&#8217;s Crown?'>A Quest for Citrix&#8217;s Crown?</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=5136</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Grid Approach to Desktop Virtualization</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=4375&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-grid-approach-to-desktop-virtualization</link>
		<comments>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=4375#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernd Harzog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktop Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presentation Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaviza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synchron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenDesktop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=4375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The grid approach to desktop virtualization, offered by vendors like Kaviza and Synchron offers several advantages in terms of cost and flexible use of hardware resources. The cost savings come from not requiring a SAN. The implications of no SAN are no VMotion, no HA and no DRS. However Citrix XenApp has proven that user and application centralization can be effectively managed without these features.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=1316' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Is Desktop Virtualization the Key to an Effective Windows 7 Migration?'>Is Desktop Virtualization the Key to an Effective Windows 7 Migration?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=3862' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Do Citrix and VMWare fail to deliver a complete centralised desktop offering?'>Do Citrix and VMWare fail to deliver a complete centralised desktop offering?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=1622' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Enterprise Desktop Strategy &#8211; White Paper'>Enterprise Desktop Strategy &#8211; White Paper</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=4375</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rampant Innovation in Desktop Virtualization</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=625&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rampant-innovation-in-desktop-virtualization</link>
		<comments>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=625#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernd Harzog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Application Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InstallFree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaviza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MokaFive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RingCube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlickAccess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symantec End Point Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UniDesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VirtualComputer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While server virtualization has largely settled down into a slugfest between VMware (vSphere), Microsoft (Hyper-V) and to a lesser extent Citrix (XenServer), and Red Hat (KVM), the desktop virtualization field remains wide open, and is being targeted by numerous startups with highly creative and appealing solutions. While VMware (View), and Citrix (XenDesktop) certainly represent the large players in the field, startups like Install Free, MokaFive, Virtual Computer, SlickAccess, Unidesk, Kavisa, and Ringcube all bring unique and differentiated solutions to the table.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=1316' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Is Desktop Virtualization the Key to an Effective Windows 7 Migration?'>Is Desktop Virtualization the Key to an Effective Windows 7 Migration?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=2850' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Desired End State for the Next Generation Desktop'>Desired End State for the Next Generation Desktop</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=3577' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Delivering your &#8220;desktop as a service&#8221; to laptop users'>Delivering your &#8220;desktop as a service&#8221; to laptop users</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=625</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
