<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware &#8211; The Next Great Platform Company?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=795&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=vmware-the-next-great-platform-company</link>
	<description>Virtualization &#38; Cloud Computing News, Resources, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:41:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=795&#038;cpage=1#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 13:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=795#comment-686</guid>
		<description>Could anything actually destabilise Microsoft? A friend of mine seems to think so. I don&#039;t understand half of what he&#039;s saying most of the time but he&#039;s been on a lot of vmware training courses, and he thinks it could be a contender. I mean, there&#039;s Apple but I tend to find that Microsoft offer very different experiences.

I&#039;ll confess to being very frustrated with Microsoft at times but they&#039;re practically synonymous with computing. From my own very limited perspective, I&#039;d be stunned if anyone managed to shunt them aside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could anything actually destabilise Microsoft? A friend of mine seems to think so. I don&#8217;t understand half of what he&#8217;s saying most of the time but he&#8217;s been on a lot of vmware training courses, and he thinks it could be a contender. I mean, there&#8217;s Apple but I tend to find that Microsoft offer very different experiences.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll confess to being very frustrated with Microsoft at times but they&#8217;re practically synonymous with computing. From my own very limited perspective, I&#8217;d be stunned if anyone managed to shunt them aside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtualization Round Up 20090914 &#124; latoga labs</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=795&#038;cpage=1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtualization Round Up 20090914 &#124; latoga labs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=795#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] VMware – The Next Great Platform Company? is an interesting view of VMware from someone who experienced Paul Maritz and Todd Nielson working together in the past. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VMware – The Next Great Platform Company? is an interesting view of VMware from someone who experienced Paul Maritz and Todd Nielson working together in the past. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMware Buys SpringSource &#124; The Virtualization Practice</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=795&#038;cpage=1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware Buys SpringSource &#124; The Virtualization Practice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=795#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] It was only a matter of time before VMware decided that if it was going to be an applications platform company, and really take on Microsoft, that it would need a presence in the business of building applications, and in providing the run-time infrastructure for applications. Acquiring SpringSource is a brilliant move because it leverages the open source community to devalue and dilute Microsoft&#8217;s standing in the applications tools and platform markets. The need for Microsoft to take this step was articulated and predicted in this post about VMware as a Platform Company. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It was only a matter of time before VMware decided that if it was going to be an applications platform company, and really take on Microsoft, that it would need a presence in the business of building applications, and in providing the run-time infrastructure for applications. Acquiring SpringSource is a brilliant move because it leverages the open source community to devalue and dilute Microsoft&#8217;s standing in the applications tools and platform markets. The need for Microsoft to take this step was articulated and predicted in this post about VMware as a Platform Company. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
