<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ulteo &#8211; Open Source Desktop Broker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=2333&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=ulteo-open-source-desktop-broker</link>
	<description>Virtualization &#38; Cloud Computing News, Resources, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:41:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmullan</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=2333&#038;cpage=1#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>bmullan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=2333#comment-263</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used both NoMachine&#039;s NXserver and FreeNX server.

They both support clients from the free NoMachine nx client or the NoMachine NX &quot;Web Interface&quot;

Both work well but sound/audio for the most part doesn&#039;t work well without extreme measures.

I&#039;d suggest also taking a look at x2go.   It is open source and the current release has clients for mac/pc/linux.

x2go uses the NoMachine NX GPL&#039;d transport libraries so has same performance more or less.

However, x2go implements a working audio interface and its client tool is very easy to setup shared directories, printer and audio.

In just a very few weeks x2go is to introduce a new Web Portal interface as well.

The server side component of x2go is highly configurable for featues such as load balancing etc.

http://www.x2go.org/index.php?id=7

So far I&#039;ve been very impressed with x2go so much so that I use instead of NX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used both NoMachine&#8217;s NXserver and FreeNX server.</p>
<p>They both support clients from the free NoMachine nx client or the NoMachine NX &#8220;Web Interface&#8221;</p>
<p>Both work well but sound/audio for the most part doesn&#8217;t work well without extreme measures.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d suggest also taking a look at x2go.   It is open source and the current release has clients for mac/pc/linux.</p>
<p>x2go uses the NoMachine NX GPL&#8217;d transport libraries so has same performance more or less.</p>
<p>However, x2go implements a working audio interface and its client tool is very easy to setup shared directories, printer and audio.</p>
<p>In just a very few weeks x2go is to introduce a new Web Portal interface as well.</p>
<p>The server side component of x2go is highly configurable for featues such as load balancing etc.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.x2go.org/index.php?id=7" rel="nofollow">http://www.x2go.org/index.php?id=7</a></p>
<p>So far I&#8217;ve been very impressed with x2go so much so that I use instead of NX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulteo – Open Source Desktop Broker &#124; The Virtualization Practice &#124; Windows (7) Affinity</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=2333&#038;cpage=1#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulteo – Open Source Desktop Broker &#124; The Virtualization Practice &#124; Windows (7) Affinity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=2333#comment-171</guid>
		<description>[...] this article: Ulteo – Open Source Desktop Broker &#124; The Virtualization Practice   No [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this article: Ulteo – Open Source Desktop Broker | The Virtualization Practice   No [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulteo – Open Source Desktop Broker &#124; The Virtualization Practice &#124; nighshift@inertz.org</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=2333&#038;cpage=1#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulteo – Open Source Desktop Broker &#124; The Virtualization Practice &#124; nighshift@inertz.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=2333#comment-124</guid>
		<description>[...] post:  Ulteo – Open Source Desktop Broker &#124; The Virtualization Practice Tags: allows, appid, missing, per-user-basis, restrict-access, should, System, the-applications, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post:  Ulteo – Open Source Desktop Broker | The Virtualization Practice Tags: allows, appid, missing, per-user-basis, restrict-access, should, System, the-applications, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulteo – Open Source Desktop Broker &#124; The Virtualization Practice&#160;&#124;&#160;Open Hacking</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=2333&#038;cpage=1#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulteo – Open Source Desktop Broker &#124; The Virtualization Practice&#160;&#124;&#160;Open Hacking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualizationpractice.com/blog/?p=2333#comment-123</guid>
		<description>[...] the original here: Ulteo – Open Source Desktop Broker &#124; The Virtualization Practice    This entry was posted on Monday, December 7th, 2009 at 9:56 am and is filed under Linux, News, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original here: Ulteo – Open Source Desktop Broker | The Virtualization Practice    This entry was posted on Monday, December 7th, 2009 at 9:56 am and is filed under Linux, News, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
